It’s a deductive argument.

Because all its premises are true (Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective) then its conclusion must be true also, because the claim asserted by its conclusion already has been stated in its premises.
Hypothetical syllogism:
If "I<Clicker 2 is a useful tool in educational settings” then “Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective.”
If “Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective.” Then “If you are looking for an exciting way to increase interaction in the classroom, then I<Clicker2 is the product for you.”
Therefore "I<Clicker 2 is a useful tool in educational setting,” Then If you are looking for an exciting way to increase interaction in the classroom, then I<Clicker2 is the product for you.”

You have provided a deductive argument that follows the hypothetical syllogism form. A hypothetical syllogism is a logical argument that uses conditional statements (if-then statements) to establish a relationship between different propositions.

In your argument, you have two conditional statements:

1. If "I<Clicker 2 is a useful tool in educational settings," then "Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective."
2. If "Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective," then "If you are looking for an exciting way to increase interaction in the classroom, then I<Clicker 2 is the product for you."

From these two conditional statements, you can logically deduce the conclusion:

"Therefore, if 'I<Clicker 2 is a useful tool in educational settings,' then 'If you are looking for an exciting way to increase interaction in the classroom, then I<Clicker 2 is the product for you.'"

To evaluate the validity of this deductive argument, you would need to ensure that both of the premises are true. In this case, you are claiming that "Many universities have begun using I<Clicker 2 to capture student response information in the classroom, and 94% of users agree that the product is effective or extremely effective." If this premise is verified to be true, then you can conclude that "I<Clicker 2 is a useful tool in educational settings," and therefore, "If you are looking for an exciting way to increase interaction in the classroom, then I<Clicker 2 is the product for you."

To confirm the truth of the premises, you may need to gather data or conduct research on the usage of I<Clicker 2 in universities and the satisfaction levels of its users.