Post a New Question

business law

posted by .

(a). Harveston asserted that Narnia’s service was invalid in part because “the return of service states that process was delivered to “JoAnn Kocerek” and did not show that she “had the authority to accept process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner.” Should such a detail, if it is required, be strictly construed and applied? Explain why it should not apply in this case? Explain

  • business law -


Answer This Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question