Friday
March 27, 2015

Homework Help: Critical Thinking

Posted by Alex L. on Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 10:19am.

Identify the correct fallacy of relevance committed by the following arguments, explain how it is used in the example, and determine what is wrong with the reasoning. (ex. What should have been said or argued?

1) Convicted murder Johnny Palko has argued that he did not receive a fair trial.But palko is a viciious thug who's psent most of his adult life behind bars. Why should we even listen to a parasite?

2) I see nothing unethical in paying bribes to foreign officials to obtain business favours. That's the way business is done in many parts of the world. Like they say, "When in Rome, do as the Romans do."

Answer this Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

Critical thining - What is the role of fallacies (rhetorical devices) in the ...
Critical thining - What is the role of fallacies(rhetorical devices) in the ...
Critical Thinking - "We could, for example, save lives by denying drivers' ...
critical thinking - Consider the following: You have learned to think and write ...
Math - Can someone work this for an example I have tried this one and several ...
crithical thinking - Critical Analysis Forms Fill out one form for each source. ...
Critical thinking - 8. “Let me demonstrate the principle by means of logic,” the...
critical thinking - The President’s agenda has been derailed by out of touch ...
critical thinking - identify the fallacy: The reason I don't accept evolution is...
crt 205 - Final Project: Comprehensive Argument Analysis The Opposing Viewpoints...

Members