one rich source of fallacies is the media,television,radio,magazines, and the internet(including of course, commericals)Identify two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied logic?What do you think those presenting these arguments assume about the logical skills of their viewwrs?Is this a good or bd assumption for the to make? Please help me with this question. Thank You

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

can you give me some some information about the question that I am require about for a very good answer. Please

I already posted this link for you. Did you read it????

This site has many examples and explanations of why they are fallacies.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

Which of those many fallacies have you heard or seen?

Thank You for this information, I will try to go from the information that you gave me. I truly think you.

You're very welcome.

I need an example of an outline for my essay paper on should physician-assisted suicide be legal,thesis,argument,counter-thesis and counter-argument.response to counter-thesis

To support a scientific hypothesis, one might

To support a scientific hypothesis, one might think is look very hard for a chicken that can fly.

One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet (including, of course, commercials.) Identify two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied logic? What do you think those presenting these arguments assume about the logical skills of their viewers? Is this a good or bad assumption for them to make?

Two distinct fallacies commonly seen in the media are the appeal to authority fallacy and the bandwagon fallacy.

1. Appeal to authority fallacy: This fallacy occurs when the credibility or expertise of a person is used as evidence to support a conclusion, even when the person may not have relevant qualifications or expertise in the subject matter being discussed. In the media, this fallacy is often seen when celebrities or well-known individuals are used to endorse products or express opinions on topics outside their expertise.

2. Bandwagon fallacy: This fallacy assumes that something is true or valid simply because many people believe or support it. In the media, this fallacy is frequently used to persuade audiences by creating a sense of popularity or conformity. Advertisements often employ this fallacy by presenting testimonials from a large number of satisfied customers to convince viewers to buy a product.

Regarding the question of whether studying logic makes one less likely to be fooled by these fallacies, it certainly helps. Studying logic equips individuals with critical thinking skills, an understanding of logical fallacies, and the ability to analyze arguments in a systematic and rational manner. This knowledge allows one to recognize flawed reasoning, pseudoscientific claims, and misleading tactics used in the media.

The assumption made by those presenting these arguments in the media is often that the logical skills of their viewers are limited or less developed. They may assume that the average viewer is easily swayed by emotional appeals, authority figures, or the popularity of an idea. While it may be true that some viewers lack critical thinking skills, it is not a good assumption to make of everyone. Underestimating the logical skills of viewers can lead to the perpetuation of misinformation and manipulation.

In conclusion, studying logic enhances one's ability to identify fallacies in the media. The assumption made by those presenting the arguments in the media about the logical skills of their viewers is not ideal, as it may lead to misleading or manipulative tactics. Encouraging critical thinking and logical analysis in media consumption is crucial for individuals to make informed judgments.