The San hunters of southern africa weren’t overwelmed during the nineteenth century because they?
A.Were protected by a treaty.
B.Were moved to reservations where they could be protected.
C.Managed to effectively fight off western colonists.
D.Live in a harsh envirement.
* I chose B but the lady I asked today at school said it was D or C. Im confused who would you agree with more?
The real question is what does your text say?
It says they lived around a harsh envirement but doesnt say they lived in it
Isn't that about the same thing?
Yeah I guess you are right
To determine the correct answer, we should look at the historical context of the San hunters of southern Africa during the nineteenth century.
During that time period, southern Africa experienced significant colonization and encroachment by Western settlers. The San people, also known as Bushmen, had traditionally been skilled hunter-gatherers living in small, mobile groups. They were not organized into a unified political entity that could effectively resist colonization.
Option A - "Were protected by a treaty" - Historically, there is no significant evidence of the San hunters being protected by a treaty during the nineteenth century. Treaties and legal protections were not generally extended to indigenous groups within the context of colonial expansion at that time.
Option B - "Were moved to reservations where they could be protected" - This option is unlikely because the concept of reservations, as seen in other contexts such as Native Americans in the United States, was not common in southern Africa during the nineteenth century. The San hunters did not have designated reservations where they could be protected.
Option C - "Managed to effectively fight off Western colonists" - This option is also unlikely because the San hunters did not have the organized military or political structure to engage in sustained resistance against Western colonists. They were overwhelmed by the technological superiority and organized efforts of the colonizers.
Option D - "Live in a harsh environment" - This option is the most accurate. The San hunters inhabited a harsh and arid environment that was less attractive to European settlers. The difficulty of survival in such an environment may have made the area less appealing for colonization, offering some protection to the San hunters initially.
In conclusion, based on the historical context, Option D, "Live in a harsh environment," seems to be the most accurate answer. However, it's essential to note that historical processes can be complex, and the impact of colonization on indigenous populations is multi-faceted, so it's possible that Option C also had some influence.