can somebody please help me paraphrase this please ??
For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity. To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household--which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes.
parphrasing - Writeacher, Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 2:51pm
Please read the following information VERY carefully:
Then use these ideas and give it a try. Once you have it completed, be sure to repost, both the original and your paraphrase, if you'd like someone to check it for you.
parphrasing - bobpursley, Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 2:56pm
Paraphase? When Susan gave this speech, Negro Slaves had been freed, JimCrow laws on voting were not enacted yet, it was the land of the free, except for women. Susan didn't like that.
Liberal,left-wing commie, probably. Today, in Texas, she probably would face hard jail time.
So we will be happy to critique your parapharase this. Her lecture to the Judge in her trial at sentencing is much more interesting than this. Try parapharsing it, it is like describing a hot potato in cool terms