PLEASE HELP.

I have this essay due tomorrow.
I need help with the following:

I have to critique the following article and write an essay.
But first I need help identifyine Fallacies and the Types of evidence present.

Then state whether or not his arguement is compelling.

Its the article by Joseph Stiglitz: "Of the 1% by the 1%, for the 1%"

Its on vanityfair . com

http://writingcenter.unc.edu/resources/handouts-demos/writing-the-paper/fallacies

Use the list at the right like a table of contents -- read about different types of fallacies before you start reading the article.

I already have a handout on fallacies.

I can't identify them in the article.
Please read the article.
I agree with the author's argument but have to look for discrepencies.

Sorry. No time to read that right now.

Read it several times ... carefully.
Take good notes.
Define the ideology.
Identify specific examples to use in your paper.

I need someone to actually read the article and attempt to answer my question. I already know the approach to writing but need input.

I'd be happy to help you identify fallacies, types of evidence, and evaluate the argument in the article by Joseph Stiglitz, titled "Of the 1% by the 1%, for the 1%." Here's a step-by-step guide on how to approach each task:

1. Identifying Fallacies:
Start by reading the article and keeping an eye out for any logical fallacies. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can weaken an argument. Common fallacies include ad hominem attacks, strawman arguments, false cause, hasty generalizations, and many more. As you read, look for instances where Stiglitz might be using fallacious reasoning to support his points. Once you notice an example, make a note of the fallacy and the specific context in which it occurs.

2. Identifying Types of Evidence:
To identify the types of evidence used in the article, pay attention to the data, facts, and examples Stiglitz provides to support his claims. Evidence can be quantitative (statistical data), qualitative (personal stories or testimonials), anecdotal (individual cases), expert opinions, or logical reasoning. As you read, take note of the evidence Stiglitz presents and categorize it based on its type. Look for patterns and consider how the evidence supports or weakens his argument.

3. Evaluating the Argument's Compelling Nature:
To determine whether Stiglitz's argument is compelling, you need to critically assess the strength of his reasoning, evidence, and overall persuasiveness. Consider the following questions while evaluating the argument:
- Is the author's main claim clear and well-defined?
- Does Stiglitz provide logical reasoning and evidence to support his claims?
- Are there any counterarguments or alternate perspectives the author fails to address?
- Is the evidence presented reliable, relevant, and sufficient?
- Does the author use persuasive language or rhetorical techniques effectively?
- Does the article provide a balanced view or seem biased?

Take notes as you go along to help you structure your essay and provide evidence for your analysis.

Remember, these steps will assist you in critically analyzing Stiglitz's article and forming your own opinion. Good luck with your essay!