construct three different arguments that display distinct fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does. Review your classmates’ examples and see if they, in fact, commit the fallacy identified.

We'll be glad to comment on your answers.

contruct three different arguments that display distinict fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does.

three examples of argument in fallacies.

Argument 1:

"All dogs have fur. My cat has fur. Therefore, my cat must be a dog."

Fallacy: This argument commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent, also known as the fallacy of the inverse. It assumes that if a statement is true, then its converse is also true. However, this is not always the case. In this argument, the statement "All dogs have fur" does not imply that all animals with fur are dogs. Therefore, the conclusion that the cat must be a dog is logically flawed.

Argument 2:
"I watched a movie with a lot of action scenes, and there were car crashes. Therefore, watching action movies causes car crashes."

Fallacy: This argument commits the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc or "after this, therefore because of this." It assumes that simply because two events occur in sequence, one must have caused the other. In reality, correlation does not necessarily imply causation. The conclusion that watching action movies causes car crashes is flawed because it ignores other possible causes of car crashes, such as reckless driving or road conditions.

Argument 3:
"Most people who eat ice cream also enjoy swimming. Therefore, eating ice cream causes people to want to swim."

Fallacy: This argument commits the fallacy of hasty generalization or overgeneralization. It takes a limited sample of people who enjoy both ice cream and swimming and applies it to a broader population. Just because most people in a specific group exhibit a certain behavior, it does not mean that behavior is universally true for everyone. The conclusion that eating ice cream causes people to want to swim is flawed because it oversimplifies the relationship between the two activities.

To review classmates' examples, one would need to analyze their arguments for logical flaws, such as fallacies in reasoning or unsupported conclusions. It's essential to critically evaluate the premises and the logical structure of the argument to identify any fallacies that may be present.