Friday

February 27, 2015

February 27, 2015

Posted by **Anonymous** on Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 9:23am.

Method 1: Test one by one. Then we have to do 100 tests.

Method 2: Divide 100 people into 25 groups with 4 people in each. Then, mix 4 people’s blood and test. If the result is negative, then everyone in this group is negative. If the result is positive, then we test these 4 people one by one. Now, the number of tests becomes 1+4=5.

Question: Which method is better?

- statistics -
**PsyDAG**, Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 8:14pmIf they are both as accurate, which will involve fewer tests?

**Answer this Question**

**Related Questions**

math - This is a statistics problem. A laboratory test for the detection of a ...

probability - A new test for detecting a disease has been developed. Medical ...

statistics - A test designed to check for sickle-cell anemia has an 85% chance ...

Probability - A screening test for a disease shows a positive test result in 95...

Probability - Suppose that 3% of the population ha a certain disease. We have a ...

Math - Police report that 88% of drivers stopped on suspicion of drunk driving ...

STATISTIC ****HELP**** - The tests done to determine if someone is HIV positive ...

help ASAP Statistic - The tests done to determine if someone is HIV positive are...

Statistic help ASAP Please - The tests done to determine if someone is HIV ...

math - how do you form the probability tree for this?? The commonly used test to...