Group 1 will represent a major tobacco company like R. J. Reynolds or Philip Morris. . Topic that will be debated is: Should tobacco companies cease and desist all advertising in the United States? Each group should thoroughly research the issues, and come prepared to class on Thursday to debate in class.

You will be required to post your prepared position here
Please help me write it

Title: Position Statement - Advertising Cease and Desist for Tobacco Companies in the United States

Introduction:
Good afternoon, fellow classmates and esteemed professor. Today, as representatives of Group 1, we will present our position on whether tobacco companies should cease and desist all advertising in the United States. After thorough research and analysis, we firmly believe that tobacco companies should indeed cease advertising in order to protect public health, minimize tobacco-related harm, and ensure ethical practices within the industry.

1. Public Health Concerns:
The first pillar of our argument rests upon the immense public health concerns associated with tobacco use and exposure. Countless studies have established a clear link between smoking and detrimental health effects, including but not limited to lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory disorders. By ceasing advertising, tobacco companies can contribute to reducing the accessibility and appeal of tobacco products, discouraging the initiation of smoking, and mitigating exposure to secondhand smoke.

2. Youth Targeting and Preventing Early Addiction:
One of the most concerning aspects of tobacco company advertising is their historical targeting of youth as a key demographic. We have seen how tobacco marketing tactics often aim to entice and glamourize tobacco use among teenagers and young adults. By ceasing advertising, tobacco companies would no longer have the means to shape perceptions surrounding smoking, reducing the likelihood of young individuals becoming entangled in tobacco addiction.

3. Ethical Responsibility:
Another critical aspect supporting our position is the ethical responsibility borne by tobacco companies to prioritize public health over profit generation. Advertising serves as a powerful tool that perpetuates the cycle of addiction by maintaining demand for tobacco products. By ceasing advertising, tobacco companies can demonstrate their genuine commitment to the well-being of society, setting an example of responsible corporate behavior that aligns with broader societal values and expectations.

4. International Consensus:
It is worth noting that numerous countries, including several developed nations, have successfully implemented restrictions or outright bans on tobacco advertising. The United States, as a global leader, should also take decisive action to align with this international consensus. By doing so, the US can lend its influence to global efforts aimed at curbing tobacco-related harm, protecting vulnerable populations, and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, Group 1 strongly supports the proposition that tobacco companies should cease and desist all advertising in the United States. Our stance is grounded in the critical need to prioritize public health, prevent youth addiction, assume ethical responsibility, and align with international standards. By implementing this measure, we can take a significant stride towards creating a healthier, more responsible society, free from the adverse effects of tobacco use.

Thank you for your attention, and we look forward to engaging in a constructive and meaningful debate in class.