I have to write a paper on the below posted question. Can anyone explain me what might i need to do in it.
1) Set out the problem of evil as clearly and completely as possible. Be sure to distinguish between moral evil and natural evil and to discuss the problems posed by each.
2) Discuss the response to the problem of evil (i.e. attempt to show that the problem of evil does not give us good reason to disbelieve in God) that you think is the strongest. This may be a response that appears in Hick's article or one that we merely discussed in class. Does this response succeed? Provide an argument to show why or why not. (Hint: If you think that a response does succeed, the best way to argue for this is to imagine what someone who disagreed might say about it and then try to defend it.)
To write an effective paper on the problem of evil, follow these step-by-step instructions:
Step 1: Understand the problem
Set out the problem of evil clearly and completely. The problem of evil refers to the philosophical question concerning the existence of evil in the world despite the presence of a presumably all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving God. Distinguish between moral evil (evil caused by human actions) and natural evil (evil caused by natural disasters or events beyond human control).
Step 2: Discuss the problems posed by each
Explain the problems posed by moral evil and natural evil. Discuss the philosophical implications and challenges they present for the existence of an all-good and all-powerful God. Consider questions such as why an omniscient and omnipotent God would allow evil to exist and how the existence of evil is compatible with the notion of a benevolent deity.
Step 3: Research the responses to the problem of evil
Explore different responses or arguments that attempt to show that the problem of evil does not provide good reasons to disbelieve in God. Focus on the response that you consider to be the strongest, which can be either from John Hick's article or from class discussions. Understand the proposed solutions and the reasoning behind them.
Step 4: Evaluate the response you find strongest
Explain why you believe the chosen response is the most compelling. Present arguments to support its effectiveness in addressing the problem of evil. Consider counterarguments that someone who disagrees might raise and provide counter-reasons defending the selected response.
Step 5: Organize your paper
Plan the structure of your paper. Start with an introduction that outlines the problem of evil and its significance. Then, discuss moral evil, followed by natural evil, presenting challenges and philosophical dilemmas. After that, introduce and analyze the response you find the strongest, critically assessing its merits. Finally, conclude by summarizing your findings and presenting your overall evaluation of the effectiveness of the response.
Step 6: Write and revise your paper
Write your paper, ensuring logical flow, clarity, and coherence. Support your arguments with evidence, examples, and quotes from reputable sources. Revise and edit your paper for clarity, grammar, spelling, and other aspects of effective writing.
Remember to cite your sources properly following the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) and proofread your paper to make sure it is free from errors before submitting it.
To write a paper on the problem of evil, you will need to follow the instructions given in the question. Here is a breakdown of the steps you need to take:
1) Set out the problem of evil: Start by defining and explaining the problem of evil. The problem of evil refers to the philosophical challenge of reconciling the existence of evil in the world with the existence of a good and powerful God. It is important to distinguish between moral evil (evil caused by human actions, such as violence or injustice) and natural evil (evil caused by natural events, such as earthquakes or diseases). Discuss the problems posed by each type of evil, considering the philosophical implications and theological debates surrounding them.
2) Discuss the response to the problem of evil: Choose the response to the problem of evil that you find strongest or most compelling. This could be a response mentioned in Hick's article (presumably a reference to John Hick, a philosopher of religion) or one discussed in class. Explain the response thoroughly, providing the main arguments and justifications for it.
After explaining the response, you should evaluate its success in addressing the problem of evil. To do this, consider potential objections or counterarguments that someone who disagrees with the response might raise. Then, present your own argument either supporting or challenging the response. Provide evidence, logical reasoning, and examples to support your argument. Be sure to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the response in relation to the problem of evil.
In summary, your paper should provide a clear and comprehensive explanation of the problem of evil, distinguish between moral and natural evil, and discuss the strongest response to the problem. Evaluate the success of this response by addressing potential counterarguments and offering your own argument.