A researcher predicts that listening to music while solving math problems will make a particular brain area more active. To test this, a research participant has her brain scanned while listening to music and solving math problems, and the brain area of interest has a percentage signal change of 58. From many previous studies with this same math problems procedure (but not listening to music), it is known that the signal change in this brain area is normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 10. (a) Using the .01 level, what should the researcher conclude? Solve this problem explicitly using all five steps of hypothesis testing, and illustrate your answer with a sketch showing the comparison distribution, the cutoff (or cutoffs), and the score of the sample on this distribution. (b) Then explain your answer to someone who has never had a course in statistics (but who is familiar with mean, standard deviation, and Z scores).

Z = (score-mean)/SD

Find table in the back of your statistics text labeled something like "areas under normal distribution" to find the proportion related to the Z score.

Decide whether you are doing a one-tailed or two-tailed test.

I'll leave the explanation up to you. If you can explain any concept clearly to someone else, you will really understand it.

(a) The five steps of hypothesis testing are as follows:

1. State the hypotheses:
- Null hypothesis (H0): Listening to music while solving math problems does not have an effect on the brain activity in the specific area.
- Alternative hypothesis (Ha): Listening to music while solving math problems increases the brain activity in the specific area.

2. Formulate an analysis plan:
- Determine the significance level (α) to use for the hypothesis test. In this case, the significance level is 0.01.
- Identify the test statistic to use. Since we know the mean and standard deviation of the population, we can use a z-test.

3. Analyze sample data:
- Calculate the z-score using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation.
- In this case, the sample mean is 58, the population mean is 35, and the population standard deviation is 10. Plugging these values into the formula: z = (58 - 35) / 10 = 2.3

4. Interpret the results:
- Compare the calculated z-score to the critical value(s) from the z-table at the chosen significance level. For a significance level of 0.01, the critical z-value is ±2.576.
- If the calculated z-score falls outside the range of the critical value(s), we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
- In this case, the calculated z-score of 2.3 does not exceed the critical value of 2.576.

5. Make conclusions:
- Since the calculated z-score falls within the range of the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
- Therefore, the researcher should conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that listening to music while solving math problems increases the brain activity in the specific area.

A sketch illustrating the comparison distribution, cutoff(s), and the score of the sample on the distribution:

```
| *
| *
| *
| *
|______________________________*_________________
Rejected Fail to Reject
Region Region
```

(b) To explain this answer to someone unfamiliar with statistics:
Based on the hypothesis test conducted, the researcher wanted to determine if there was enough evidence to support the claim that listening to music while solving math problems increases brain activity in a specific area. The null hypothesis assumed that the music had no effect, while the alternative hypothesis argued that it did increase brain activity.

To test this, the researcher collected data from a participant who listened to music while solving math problems and recorded a brain activity signal change of 58 in the area of interest. The researcher then compared this score to the distribution of signal changes recorded in previous studies, where music was not present. The distribution followed a normal distribution, with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 10.

By calculating the z-score of the participant's score (58) using the population mean and standard deviation, we found it to be 2.3. We then compared this z-score to the critical value(s) (2.576) obtained from the z-table using a significance level of 0.01.

Since the calculated z-score (2.3) does not exceed the critical value (2.576), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is not enough evidence to conclude that listening to music while solving math problems increases brain activity in the specific area.

In simpler terms, the researcher's prediction that music would make the brain area more active was not supported by the data collected. The brain activity observed while listening to music and solving math problems fell within the range of what would be expected if music had no effect. Therefore, we cannot say with confidence that music has a significant impact on brain activity during math problem-solving.

(a) To test the researcher's prediction, we need to follow the five steps of hypothesis testing:

Step 1: Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses.
The null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no difference in the brain area activation between listening to music and solving math problems, and any observed difference is due to random chance. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that listening to music while solving math problems will make the brain area more active.

H0: μ = 35 (population mean)
Ha: μ > 35 (population mean)

Step 2: Choose the significance level.
The significance level (α) is the probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. In this case, the significance level is given as 0.01, so α = 0.01.

Step 3: Collect the data and calculate the test statistic.
The test statistic we will use is the Z-score, which measures how many standard deviations the sample value is away from the population mean.

z = (x - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n))

In this case, the sample mean (x) is 58, the population mean (μ) is 35, the population standard deviation (σ) is 10, and the sample size (n) is not provided.

Step 4: Determine the critical value(s) or the p-value.
Since the alternative hypothesis is for a one-tailed test (μ > 35), we will look for the critical value on the right side of the distribution corresponding to a significance level of 0.01. This critical value is often denoted as z(α), and we can find it using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software.

For a significance level of 0.01, the critical value is approximately 2.33.

Step 5: Make a decision and interpret the results.
If the calculated test statistic (Z-score) is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If it is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Let's calculate the Z-score:

z = (58 - 35) / (10 / sqrt(n))

From the information given, we don't have the sample size (n), so we can't calculate the exact Z-score at this point. But let's assume for now that the Z-score calculated is indeed greater than 2.33.

If Z > 2.33, we reject the null hypothesis. This means that listening to music while solving math problems does lead to a significantly higher brain area activation.

(b) To explain this to someone unfamiliar with statistics, we can break it down using familiar concepts:

Imagine you have a group of people who are solving math problems. In previous studies without music, the average brain area activity was measured to be 35, and the standard deviation was 10. This means that most people had brain area activity close to 35, with some higher or lower values due to natural variation.

Now, the researcher wanted to see if listening to music while solving math problems would make the brain area more active. They tested this by having one participant solve math problems while their brain activity was scanned. The result showed that the brain area activity for this participant was 58.

To determine if this difference is significant or just due to chance, we use hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis says there is no difference between listening to music and brain activity, and any observed difference is just random. The alternative hypothesis says that listening to music does make a difference in brain activity.

To test these hypotheses, we calculate a statistic called the Z-score. Essentially, it tells us how many standard deviations away the participant's brain activity is from the average brain activity without music (35). In this case, assuming the Z-score is greater than 2.33 (using the 0.01 level), it means the participant's brain activity is significantly higher than what is expected by chance alone.

Therefore, we reject the idea that listening to music has no effect on brain activity during math problem solving and conclude that listening to music does make a particular brain area more active.