A cookie company's management wants to increase the number of employees belonging to minority groups.They implement a policy determining that a fixed percentage of recruits should be members of groups Which legal constraint is breached by this decision?.A) infringing upon the majority employee's right,b) minimizing intrusion into expectations, c)setting aside positions,D) attaining a balanced workforce IS A CORRECT ANSWER ,THANK YOU
business ethics - Ms. Sue, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 5:42pm
business ethics - vedrana, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:04pm
THANK YOU,I still have one question which i don't understand maybe you can help me ;
2. Reah filed a case against her employer who dismissed her from service for reporting to work under the influence of alcohol. Which of these would be valid reason to contest the dismissal?
a.)Reah's employer had not listed reporting to work after consuming alcohol as
one of the grounds for dismissal.
b.)The process of dismissal that the company followed as a policy was not
sufficient to protect employees against arbitrary decisions.
c.)The act of reporting to work under the influence of alcohol, for which Reah
was dismissed, though not positive, cannot be classified as a just cause.
d.)Reah's employers had not followed the process of dismissal as stated in the
company's human resources policy documen
business ethics - Ms. Sue, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:16pm
I think all of those answers could be possible. We simply don't have enough information to make a knowledgeable judgment.
My best guess is that a) is the required answer.
business ethics - vedrana, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:23pm
THANK YOU SO MUCH:)
business ethics - Writeacher, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:24pm
Either a or d. I've known people who were unremoveable because their supervisors didn't follow the process correctly or completely.
business ethics - Ms. Sue, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:49pm
I've had the same experience with d as Writeacher.
You're very welcome.
business ethics - bobpursley, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 6:56pm
I would go with d, if there are policy procedures, they must be followed, otherwise, due process is nullified.
business ethics - Anonymous, Saturday, January 25, 2014 at 11:18pm
Reah filed a case against her employer who dismissed her for being under the influence of alcohol. what would be a valid reason to contest
business ethics - Jerone, Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 2:45pm
I think the answer is D. A seemed like it could be an option but after thinking about it I came to the conclusion that they aren't any jobs where you are supposed to work under the influence