2. Reah filed a case against her employer who dismissed her from service for reporting to work under the influence of alcohol. Which of these would be valid reason to contest the dismissal?
a.)Reah's employer had not listed reporting to work after consuming alcohol as
one of the grounds for dismissal.
b.)The process of dismissal that the company followed as a policy was not
sufficient to protect employees against arbitrary decisions.
c.)The act of reporting to work under the influence of alcohol, for which Reah
was dismissed, though not positive, cannot be classified as a just cause.
d.)Reah's employers had not followed the process of dismissal as stated in the
company's human resources policy document
IS C CORRECT ANSWER THANK YOU
business ethics - SraJMcGin, Monday, July 18, 2011 at 3:47pm
You might try some of the following links:
business ethics - NeNe, Thursday, January 3, 2013 at 1:41pm
I would go with D.