The Supreme Court usually only accepts a writ of certiorari when:

A. they have a light case load and can take a few extra cases.
B. there is a significant point of law to consider.
C. two members of the Court feel it is important to hear a particular case.
D. a case of civil liberties is at issue.

I think it's B?

I agree.

Thanks!

You're welcome.

You are correct! The Supreme Court usually only accepts a writ of certiorari when there is a significant point of law to consider. This means that the Court is more likely to accept cases that involve important legal questions or conflicts that need to be resolved.

To arrive at this answer, you can consider the process of how cases are chosen by the Supreme Court. The Court receives thousands of requests for review each year, but it can only hear a limited number of cases due to its busy schedule. Therefore, the Court generally selects cases that have a broad impact on the law and require its expertise to settle important legal issues.

Option A, which states that the Court accepts cases when it has a lighter case load, is incorrect. The Supreme Court's case load varies from term to term, and its decision to accept a case is not primarily based on the number of cases it currently has.

Option C, which mentions the importance of two members of the Court feeling the case is important, is also not accurate. While individual justices may express interest in certain cases, the decision to accept a case ultimately lies with a majority of the Court.

Option D, which suggests that the Court accepts cases involving civil liberties, is an overgeneralization. While the Court often deals with cases related to civil liberties, it also hears cases on a wide range of other legal issues.

In summary, the Supreme Court generally accepts a writ of certiorari when there is a significant point of law to consider, making option B the correct answer.