How can organizations identify risk? Is one method more effective than another? Why or why not?

http://www.executivebrief.com/risk-management/risk-management-principles-identify-risks/

http://www.riskmanagementguide.com/organizational-chart-a-technique-to-identify-risk/

Organizations can identify risks through various methods. Here are a few common ones:

1. Risk Assessment: Conducting a risk assessment involves evaluating potential risks based on their likelihood and impact on the organization's objectives. This can be done by examining historical data, conducting interviews or surveys, or using specialized risk assessment tools.

2. Internal and External Audits: Audits provide an opportunity for organizations to identify risks by evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls and compliance with laws, regulations, and industry standards. Internal audits are conducted by the organization's own staff, while external audits involve independent third parties.

3. Scenario Analysis: Organizations can analyze different scenarios to identify potential risks. This involves considering a range of possible future events or conditions and assessing their potential impact on the organization.

4. Brainstorming and Expert Input: By gathering input from employees, stakeholders, subject matter experts, and industry professionals, organizations can identify risks that may not have been otherwise considered. Brainstorming sessions and workshops can be effective in generating a broad range of potential risks.

5. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs): KRIs are specific metrics or indicators that are designed to provide early warning signs of potential risks. By monitoring these indicators, organizations can identify emerging risks or changes in risk levels.

As for the effectiveness of these methods, it is important to note that no single method is universally superior. The effectiveness depends on various factors such as the organization's industry, size, complexity, and resources. Different methods may be more suitable in different contexts.

A comprehensive approach combining multiple methods often yields the best results. It allows organizations to gain a holistic understanding of risks from various perspectives and increases the likelihood of capturing a wide range of potential risks. Effective risk identification involves a continuous and proactive effort rather than relying solely on a single method.