Truth tables can?
display all the possible truth values involved with a set of sentences.
determine what scientific claims are true.
determine if inductive arguments are strong.
determine if inductive arguments are weak
Truth tables can display all the possible truth values involved with a set of sentences. They provide a systematic way to analyze the logical relationships between propositions and their truth values. By listing all the possible combinations of truth values for the component propositions, truth tables can help determine the truth value of complex compound propositions.
However, truth tables alone cannot determine what scientific claims are true. Scientific claims are typically based on empirical evidence and require experimental verification or observation to establish their truth. Truth tables deal with logical relationships and are not sufficient to analyze scientific claims that involve real-world phenomena.
Similarly, truth tables alone cannot determine if inductive arguments are strong or weak. Inductive arguments are based on observations or evidence and aim to generalize from specific instances to a general conclusion. Evaluating the strength or weakness of an inductive argument requires assessing the quality and quantity of the supporting evidence, the relevance of the examples, and considering alternative explanations. While truth tables can be useful in evaluating deductive validity, they do not directly apply to assessing the strength or weakness of inductive reasoning.