Consider a debate over whether prayer should be allowed in public schools. Explain what logic can and cannot do. In other words, what kinds of questions and topics are not decided by logical analysis?

Topics involving religion cannot be decided by logical analysis because they involve emotions and beliefs. Even the Supreme Court rulings that public school prayer is unconstitutional is open to debate.

Check this site.

http://www.adl.org/religion_ps_2004/prayer.asp

Explain what logic can and cannot do. In other words, what kinds of questions and logic are not decided by logical analysis?

Logic is a powerful tool for reasoning and analysis, but there are limitations to what it can do. Let's consider the debate over prayer in public schools to understand what logic can and cannot accomplish.

Logic is best suited for dealing with questions that involve clear and well-defined concepts, premises, and conclusions. It can help us in understanding the structure of arguments, identifying fallacies, and evaluating the validity of deductive reasoning. In the context of the prayer debate, logic can assist in analyzing the consistency and coherence of arguments put forth by both sides, helping to identify any logical fallacies or incorrect reasoning.

When it comes to questions related to personal preferences, values, and subjective experiences, logic has its limitations. Logic alone cannot determine what is morally right or wrong, or what is fair or just. These questions involve issues of ethics, beliefs, and emotions, which go beyond the realm of logical analysis.

In the prayer in public schools debate, the decision is not solely dependent on logical analysis. There are broader considerations at play, such as the separation of church and state, individual freedom of religion, multiculturalism, and the value society places on inclusivity. These factors require engaging in ethical, legal, and sociopolitical discussions rather than relying solely on logical argumentation.

Ultimately, logic can provide a framework for analyzing the arguments presented, but it cannot make subjective value judgments or settle matters of personal belief. To fully address the question of whether prayer should be allowed in public schools, a comprehensive approach that incorporates logical reasoning alongside ethical, social, and legal considerations is necessary.