Posted by Carnita on Sunday, June 19, 2011 at 11:31pm.
Please note that no one here will do your work for you. However, we will be happy to read over whatever you come up with and make suggestions and/or corrections.
Please post what you think.
Kurt Mossler (2008) states; “Relativism offer alternatives to traditional theories of ethics.” There is one question that I would have a difficult time accepting accordance to the relativist response. This question would be: Should soldiers, cops, executioners, and doctors be consider as killers even though they do it in order to protect and help society? According to the text the relativist response would be yes, soldiers, cops, executioners, doctors, and executioners are still consider to be murders and that is unlawful. I think the relativist might have a problem giving a justified response because this question can go both ways. There is not wrong or right answer. Sometimes a person does not have a choice to kill and sometimes it just happens without warning. For example, a doctor operates on a patient that have heart problems and during the surgery something happens that unexpected the patient dies.
Related Questions
Philosophy - Our text discusses the challenge relativism presents to various ...
philosophy - Our text discusses the challenge relativism presents to various ...
phi 200 - Consider a specific moral question which might make it difficult to ...
hilosophy - a specific moral question which might make it difficult to accept ...
phi 200 - Our text discusses the challenge relativism presents to various ...
philosophy - State the moral issue involved, and provide an explanation as to ...
Philosophy - I have a paper due and need help with this question. should we ...
Critical Thinking - Post your response to the following: State your stance on ...
critical thinking - Resource: “Terri Schiavo’s Parents” news ...
Ethics - Please help with an assignment: I need to pick 5 articles from the ...
For Further Reading
