Posted by kozy on Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 11:50pm.
Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to justify answer.
If it is cold, then you need a coat.
You do not need a coat.
It is not cold.
(Points : 2)
Valid by the law of detachment
Valid by the law of contraposition
Invalid by fallacy of the converse
Invalid by fallacy of the inverse
Valid by the law of syllogism
Valid by disjunctive syllogism

math  MathMate, Monday, May 23, 2011 at 9:08am
Let
P: "it is cold"
Q: "you need a coat"
The first statement is therefore
P → Q
The second part has been written in two separate statements, ¬Q, ¬P.
If we can assume it to be related as "It is not cold, therefore you do not need a coat", or
¬Q → ¬P, then you can take one of the given choices, using the following help:
law of detachment:
(P∧Q) ∧ P => Q
law of contraposition:
(P → Q) ≡ (¬Q → ¬P)
converse of P → Q:
Q → P
inverse of P → Q:
¬P → ¬Q
law of syllogism (transitivity):
(P → Q) ∧ (Q → R) => (P → R)
disjunctive syllogism:
[P → (Q ∨ R)] ∧ ¬R => (P → Q)
Answer This Question
Related Questions
 math  please help... determine if the argument is valid or invalid along with ...
 Mathgeometry  Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to ...
 English  1. Because she felt cold, Susan put on her coat. 2. Because Susan felt...
 guidance  Fouryearold Nathan refuses to put on his coat before going out to ...
 guidance  Fouryearold Nathan refuses to put on his coat before going out to ...
 math for liberal arts  construct a truth table to determine whether each ...
 PHI 103  "All dogs hate cats. Sirius is a dog. So Sirius hates cats" is an ...
 philosophy  Truth tables can determine which of the following? (Points : 1) If ...
 English  Can you please tell me if all the alternatives I included are correct...
 Math for Liberal Arts  Directions: Define the necessary symbols, rewrite the ...
More Related Questions