In "Some Moral Minima," Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right? Using specific examples, explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism. Determine whether you think there are such universal moral requirements, and defend your answer in a well-argued three-page paper

In "Some Moral Minima," Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right? Using specific examples, explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism. Determine whether you think there are such universal moral requirements, and defend your answer in a well-argued three-page paper.

My crystal ball is on the blink tonight. I can't see what you think.

what are some examples,explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism

To determine whether Lenn Goodman's argument in "Some Moral Minima" is right or not, we need to analyze his position on moral relativism and the challenges he presents to it. The essay explores the idea that there are certain actions that are universally wrong, regardless of individual or cultural differences. Let's break down the question and outline a three-page paper to address it.

I. Introduction (approximately one paragraph)
- Introduce the topic and provide a thesis statement expressing your position on Goodman's argument.

II. Summary of Goodman's Argument (approximately one paragraph)
- Explain Goodman's position on moral relativism and his claim that there are certain actions universally regarded as wrong.
- Provide specific examples that Goodman presents to illustrate his point.

III. Challenges to Relativism (approximately one to two paragraphs)
- Explore the challenges Goodman presents to moral relativism.
- Discuss how cultural differences can lead to conflicting moral views.
- Analyze the tension between individual autonomy and universal moral requirements.
- Consider the implications of moral relativism on issues like human rights and social progress.

IV. Evaluation of Goodman's Argument (approximately one to two paragraphs)
- Discuss your own perspective on Goodman's argument.
- Assess the strengths and weaknesses of his position.
- Provide examples from everyday life or history that support or contradict his claims.
- Consider alternative ethical frameworks that may provide a different perspective on universal moral requirements.

V. Defense of Your Position (approximately one paragraph)
- Summarize your main arguments and reiterate your thesis statement.
- Use evidence, logic, and reasoning to defend your position.
- Address potential counterarguments and explain why your viewpoint is more convincing.

VI. Conclusion (approximately one paragraph)
- Summarize the main points made in the paper.
- Offer some final thoughts on the topic.
- Restate your position and provide a closing statement.

Remember to support your arguments with relevant sources and provide citations accordingly. This outline should serve as a guide for structuring your paper effectively. Good luck!