assuming the force is parallel to the surface.
solve for mu.
Good in it-self is one of the three kinds of goods outlined, understood as harmless pleasures. This is trying to say that if something is really good in itself, nothing bad can come from it. For example, the feeling of the first warm sunbeam of the early spring. The second good is good (only) for something else also known as onerous goods. This kind of good is only for something else are goods pursued only what come from them and not all because they are in them-selves. Which in the right situation this good are the goods to have something or do. These are also known as instrumental goods useful as means to further ends, and the last one is good both in itself and for what comes from it. An example of this kind of good is health, because health it itself kind of good and can also be an instrumental good. So without heath it is almost impossible to have a steady job and also without good health you cannot enjoy the goods.
Taking justice as the kind of good which they talked about immoralist account of justice as the advantage of the strong fails, and that it posses a kind of challenge that justice has to its normative force as a necessary, best kind of good in it self. That also justice be choice worthy not because of what is it, but merely because of what it gets you.
The argument that only justice is always more choice-worthy than even the perfect injustice, not only that one of the best kind of goods and therefore at least good in itself. Socrates says that justice is good necessary to enjoying any other possible human good. The example that was given was that even if some description is kind of accurate of some wired kind of moral truth, why does it matter? That was why where be moral came from. So which bring us to an understanding that no moral facts exist to be known, and also since moral disagreements merely clashes in moral sensibility rather than the differences about matters of fact.
Utilitarianism is the view that one ought to do that which brings about “happiness” over all consequences, regardless of who benefits or where this happiness happens to be. As a consequence account, utilitarianism grounds its moral theory in the goodness or badness of the resulting states of affairs. Everything else has its moral value derivatively from this. That is the good is to the right. Deontological account, the resulting of affairs (Z) is good only insofar as it arises the right actions. Example of the right is to the good.