According to the Anti-Federelist, to strong a government meant?

It meant that the states wouldn't have much power.

To understand the position of the Anti-Federalists on a strong government, we can look at their beliefs and arguments as outlined in their writings during the debate over the ratification of the United States Constitution.

The Anti-Federalists, led by figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason, opposed the proposed Constitution of 1787 because they believed it created a federal government that was too powerful and could potentially threaten individual liberties. They were concerned that a strong central government would lead to a loss of power for the states and erode the people's rights.

According to the Anti-Federalists, a strong government meant several things:

1. Tyranny: They feared that a strong government would become tyrannical, similar to the British monarchy that the American colonies had just fought to gain independence from. They argued that concentrated power in the hands of a few would inevitably lead to abuse and the suppression of individual rights.

2. Loss of state sovereignty: The Anti-Federalists were advocates for states' rights, believing that each state should have significant autonomy and independence. They argued that a strong federal government would undermine the sovereignty of individual states, reducing their ability to govern their own affairs.

3. Lack of representation: Another concern was that a strong government would be less responsive to the needs and concerns of the people. They believed that a central authority, distant from the daily lives of citizens, would not adequately represent their interests.

4. Potential for corruption and elitism: The Anti-Federalists were wary of a strong government becoming susceptible to corruption and being dominated by the wealthy and powerful. They believed that the common people would be overshadowed by an elite class, which would further marginalize the voice of ordinary citizens.

In summary, the Anti-Federalists believed that a strong government would pave the way for tyranny, erode state sovereignty, diminish representation, and foster corruption and elitism. Their perspective played a significant role in shaping the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution to address some of their concerns and protect individual liberties.