Posted by **donovan** on Monday, January 31, 2011 at 12:33pm.

A bit confused with this one: Is the argument correct? if not explain why it's not and change the minor premise to make it correct:

All NBA basketball players are over 5ft. tall

Russell is 6ft tall

Therefore, Russell plays in the NBA

Thanks!

- math-premises -
**donovan**, Monday, January 31, 2011 at 12:36pm
I meant to add my thoughts: I think it is incorrect because of an inverse problem. To make it correct I would write it as:

All NBA basketball players are over 5ft tall

Russell is an NBA player

Therefore, Russell is over 6ft tall.

- math-premises -
**MathMate**, Monday, January 31, 2011 at 5:36pm
The first post has made a wrong conclusion. (p->q and q->p are different propositinos)

The second conclusion is correct.

- math-premises -
**donovan**, Tuesday, February 1, 2011 at 11:47am
thank you!

- math-premises -
**MathMate**, Tuesday, February 1, 2011 at 5:16pm
You're welcome!

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- math - Determine whether the following argument is correct. If it's not correct...
- math - Determine whether the following argument is correct. If it’s not correct...
- Geometry... Please help soon! - Write four arguments that meet the following ...
- critical thinking - is this an example of an invalid argument All crows are ...
- Math - Number Sense Fabio said that there are 3 times as many people on a ...
- Math - Number Sense Fabio said that there are 3 times as many people on a ...
- PHI103: Informal Logic - 1) In the truth table for an invalid argument, Student ...
- College Critical Reading - Can someone please let me know if I am right on these...
- PHI103 - All Whales are mammals. All mammals have hair or fur. Therefore, all ...
- PHI103 - To criticize a deductive argument logically, one might: hit the person ...

More Related Questions