Posted by Simon on Wednesday, December 22, 2010 at 3:21am.
I agree with the two equations you have written and that substitution of FN into the second equation is the way to solve for mu. I have not gone through the numbers but assume the 0.0567 figure is correct for the minimum mu(static)
Perhaps the answer to your question has soimething to do with the mu*sinA term being very small compared to 1. The effect of the upward component of the friction force is quite small compared to Mg
So does that mean you can just use friction force without resolving it into its components, and so what you use in you equation would be:
M V^2/R = M g sin A - M g cosA*mu
(This is what you did in the previous example)
So did you basically just ignore the vertical component of friction because it is extremely tiny and assume that FN = mg?
Related Questions
physics - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 55 ...
PHYSICS - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 60 ...
Physics Mechanics - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic ...
physics - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 84 ...
Physics - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 60 ...
Physics - A banked circular highway curve is designed for traffic moving at 65 ...
PHYSICS - A circular curve of highway with radius 200m is designed for traffic ...
Physics - Imagine that you are designing a circular curve in a highway that must...
physics - A highway curve with a radius of 430 m is banked properly for a car ...
College math - Highway curves If a circular curve without any banking has a ...
For Further Reading