In collecting information, the chief problem often facing historians and reporters is that there are too few facts or too many:

A. Details
B. Opinions
C. Photographs
D. Charts and Graphs

is it A?

Probably, but I'd want to know if there's a particular time period involved.

Thats all the question asks. |:

Then I'd say you're right since photography and charts and graphs have not existed during the whole of human history.

The answer to the question is not A. To determine the correct answer, let's go through the options together.

A. Details: While it is true that having too many details can sometimes make it challenging to sift through the information, this is not the chief problem facing historians and reporters when collecting information.

B. Opinions: Opinions can certainly be a challenge when trying to gather factual information, but it is not the chief problem mentioned in the question.

C. Photographs: Although photographs can provide visual evidence, the question does not specifically refer to the number of photographs as a problem.

D. Charts and Graphs: This option refers to visual representations of data, which may be helpful in some cases but is not mentioned as a problem in the question.

Given that none of the options seem to be the correct answer, we need to reconsider the question and analyze it further. The question suggests that historians and reporters face a common problem when collecting information, either due to too few facts or too many of something else.

Given this information, the most logical choice would be B. Opinions. Historians and reporters often strive to present objective and factual information, so dealing with a surplus of opinions can complicate their work.