Posted by gaby on Monday, November 29, 2010 at 10:42pm.
His point is that mankind is fundamentally ignorant. There's much that we as individuals and as a society do not know. We should recognize our ignorance. He supports this thesis with several examples.
http://www.landinstitute.org/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/10/03/42c0db19e37f4
we should recognize it and do what with it? continue to educate ourselves or just stop because its too much for us to know. also, i understood him being very negative towards knowledge in general and it came accross to me as if he's saying we shouldnt have meddled with it in the first place considering all our experiments are huritng our environment.
I think he's saying that we should always be skeptical and realize we are ignorant.
Related Questions
Physics - Wes and Lindsay stand on the roof of a building. Wes leans over the ...
Physics - Wes and Lindsay stand on the roof of a building. Wes leans over the ...
Physics - Wes and Lindsay stand on the roof of a building. Wes leans over the ...
Physics - Wes and Lindsay stand on the roof of a building. Wes leans over the ...
Please can help me solving my problems(Probality) - Probability that Jackson is ...
MATH (Probability) - Jackson and Alice are the boss and secretary respectively ...
US HISTORY - ARTICLE 8 OF THE PLATT AMENDMENT: "THAT BY WAYOF FURTHER ...
math - Simplify: y-(-y+5)
History - Why was Andrew Jackson considered a "common man" political ...
Family law - In Jackson v. Jackson, the court approaches the issue of changing...
For Further Reading