Posted by **liz c** on Sunday, November 14, 2010 at 1:01am.

In a study of Tibetan children, a total of 1546 children were examined. Of these, 1017 had rickets. Of the 245 urban children in the study, 94 had rickets. (a) How many children living in nonurban areas had rickets?

1Your answer is incorrect.

(b) How many children living in nonurban areas did not have rickets?

2

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- elementary statistics - 56% of families had no children under the age of 18;17% ...
- Statistics - According to a 2000 study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, ...
- math - A quasi-scientific study was done to find some link to autism. In the ...
- 4th grade math - Can you check please. 1. Melvin had 20 children in his ...
- Calculus - During a flu epidemic, the number of children in the Woodbridge ...
- the fallacies of generalizing PLEASE HELP! - A quasi-scientific study was done ...
- maths - At a fun fair, each mother there had brought 2 children. At the end of ...
- SIXTH GRADE MATH - The ratio of boys to girls at a day care cent is 5 to 4. ...
- Statistics - Can you explain confidence intervals as it relates to the results ...
- history - Which of the following is true regarding deaf and blind children in ...

More Related Questions