Tuesday

October 21, 2014

October 21, 2014

Posted by **david** on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 at 2:07am.

- economics (game theory) -
**Alona**, Tuesday, November 9, 2010 at 2:18amThere is not an exact square that you could be sure you'd NOT get three in a row but by gaining the knowledge the first move your opponent makes, you have a higher chance of NOT getting three in a row, the closer you mark your variable to your opponents, and the further your second move is away from your first move (i.e. you want your opponent to be in between yours if possible). In a very obvious way to see it, the simple strategy is to lose the game in order to "win."

**Answer this Question**

**Related Questions**

maths, economics, game theory - 1. What is a degenerate game? 2. Is the ...

managerial economics - Consider the one-shot, simultaneous move game below, and ...

economics - Consider the price strategy of Delta Airlines for its Detroit-to-...

economics - Consider the price strategy of Delta Airlines for its Detroit-to-...

economics - Consider the price strategy of Delta Airlines for its Detroit-to-...

Economics - In a one-shot game, if your rival advertises and you advertise, he ...

managerial economics - Players A and B are playing a simultaneous moves game and...

math - mike claims that the probability of winning a pick 6 number game where ...

computer science - This week you will determine the time complexity for a game ...

MACROeconomics - Game Theory - I don’t get anything from below except for (c). ...