If the U.S. were to have another constitutional convention, would we keep a federal system or change it? why or why not?
This is an opinion question. No one can answer these questions except you.
Please repost when you have written all this up, and someone here will be happy to critique your writing.
Are you also Mary? I posted some links on the post 2 after yours.
Sra
To answer this question, we need to examine the process of a constitutional convention and the factors that would likely influence the decision to keep or change the federal system in the United States.
A constitutional convention is a gathering where representatives come together to propose and debate changes to the existing constitution or create an entirely new constitution. The decision to convene a constitutional convention in the United States requires significant political will, as it would involve a large-scale amendment to the existing framework of the government.
Regarding the federal system, which is the division of power between a central government and individual states, the outcome of a constitutional convention would depend on several factors:
1. Historical Perspective: The current federal system in the United States has been effective in providing a balance between the powers of the federal government and those of the states. The framers of the original constitution chose this system to address the concerns of both a strong national government and the sovereignty of the states. Any proposal to change the federal system would need to consider this historical precedent and evaluate the reasons behind its effectiveness.
2. Contemporary Issues and Public Sentiment: The decision to keep or change the federal system would likely be influenced by contemporary issues and public sentiment. Public opinion surrounding the effectiveness of the current system, the level of satisfaction with the federal-state relationship, and the challenges facing the country could all play a role in determining whether the system needs to be revised or reimagined.
3. Political Consensus: For any significant change to the federal system, a broad consensus among the political factions and states would be necessary. The path towards constitutional amendments can be complex and requires considerable support, including a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress or a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states.
Ultimately, the decision to keep or change the federal system would be a result of a deliberative process involving extensive discussions and debates among various stakeholders. It would require a careful evaluation of historical context, contemporary challenges, and the collective will of the people and political representatives.