March 24, 2017

Post a New Question

Posted by on Monday, October 25, 2010 at 11:34pm.

Pojman argues that we should strive to form a world in which "the virtuous are rewarded and the vicious punished in proportion to their relative deserts." Do you agree with Pojman that we deserve what we earn, or do you see problems with his stance? Form a cohesive, well-argued three-page paper in which you explore this question. Use specific examples, and support your arguments.

  • college - , Tuesday, October 26, 2010 at 12:23am

    I agree. There should be consequences for actions, so that people cannot do whatever they want. The world would be in total chaos if everyone did what they wanted to when they wanted to. What do you think?

  • college Philosopy? - , Tuesday, October 26, 2010 at 11:02am

    From a psychological standpoint, it would make sense. People tend to repeat actions that lead to rewards and avoid actions that (only) lead to punishment. However, in real life, some vicious acts are immediately rewarded with the punishment only coming after a significant delay, as in our legal system.

Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question