OOP is definitely the latest trend in the IT world. But when comparing OOP to structured (or traditional) programming, can you think of a draw-back using OOP? Should you use OOP for everything or is there a reason to sometimes use structured instead?
An eye doctor shines a bright light into a patient's eye. In one to two sentences, explain how the patient's brain perceives the bright light.
The bright light stimulates the photoreceptor cells in the patient's retina, which then send signals to the brain via the optic nerve. The brain interprets these signals as the perception of bright light.
When comparing object-oriented programming (OOP) to structured programming, there are a few drawbacks you should consider. One drawback of OOP is that it can be more complex and require a steeper learning curve compared to structured programming. OOP involves understanding concepts like classes, objects, inheritance, and polymorphism, which may take time for developers to grasp.
Another drawback of OOP is that it can lead to over-engineering if not used appropriately. OOP encourages code reusability and modularity through the creation of classes and objects. However, if these concepts are not properly managed, it can result in unnecessarily complex code structures, leading to inefficiency and reduced maintainability.
Moreover, OOP may not be the best choice for certain scenarios. For simple and small-scale projects that do not require complex interactions and relationships between entities, structured programming can be more straightforward and efficient. Structured programming focuses on procedures and functions, allowing for a linear and logical flow of code.
So, it is not necessary to use OOP for everything. There are cases where using structured programming may be more suitable and advantageous. It ultimately depends on the nature and complexity of the project, as well as the skills and preferences of the development team.