Post a New Question

Social Studies

posted by .

Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessey vs Ferguson, this finding of the Kansas court is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessey vs Ferguson contrary to the finding is rejected. We concluded that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place.

The passage implies that Plessey vs. Ferguson.

1. called for intergration.
2. stated that separtated facilities wer unequal.
3. was based on out bounded psychology.
4. was constitutional
5. applied only to private schools.

  • Social Studies -

    Here's the key sentence:

    We concluded that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place.

    Which answer do you think is best?

Answer This Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question