Friday

February 27, 2015

February 27, 2015

Posted by **Shadow** on Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 9:48pm.

-False-If all male are human, then all human are male.

-True-If all male are human, then all human are not male.

Does this make any sense? If not could you guy give me an idea on how to solve this one? Thanks

- Math -
**Ms. Sue**, Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 9:55pmYour conditional statement is "If all males are human . . ."

If you insert "not" in this statement, then you'd have: "If all males are not human . . . "

If all males are not human, then some males must not be human.

Isn't that a true statement? (Think about lower animals that are male.)

- Math -
**Shadow**, Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 10:01pmYes. I thought I'm only allow to use the word "not" once. Thanks

- Math -
**Ms. Sue**, Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 10:15pmHow about . . .

If all males are not human, then some males are animals.

**Answer this Question**

**Related Questions**

To:Ms.Sue - Is it even possible to include the word "not" in a conditional to ...

Geometry - Can you tell em if this is right? If not, can you tell me what words ...

Math - Part 1: Write two conditional statements for which the converse is true. ...

Math - write the converse and contrapositive for the conditional statement below...

Math - write the converse and contrapositive for the conditional statement below...

Phil103 Informal Logic - . If P is false, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P...

Math - Is the truth value of this statement true: If 2^2 is ¡Ù 4, then 3^2 ¡Ù 6...

PHI103 - 1. "P v Q" is best interpreted as (Points : 1) P or Q but not both P ...

phi103 - 1. A conditional sentence with a false antecedent is always (Points : ...

Math-please check - Determine if a true bioconditional can be written from each ...