Describe meetings that resulted in the Japanese seeing “Rolls-Royce, Rolls-Royce, Ford,” and how was this part of Americans “clamoring for the outlawry of war.”

What kind of HELP do you need? You need to be specific when asking questions here, and your questions need to make sense.

If all you do is post your entire assignment, nothing will happen since no one here will do your work for you. But if you are specific about what you don't understand about the assignment or exactly what help you need, someone might be able to assist you.

what were the meetings that resulted in the Japanese seeing in the Rolls Royce Ford? I seem not to understand the concept if you can please explain it i will appreciate it.

The phrase "Rolls-Royce, Rolls-Royce, Ford" refers to the conversations that took place during the Washington Naval Conference of 1921-1922. This conference was a series of meetings held in Washington D.C. among the major world powers to discuss naval disarmament and international relations following World War I.

During the conference, representatives from various countries convened to negotiate treaties aimed at limiting the size of naval fleets and promoting peace through disarmament. The intention was to prevent a costly arms race that could lead to future conflicts. Key participants included the United States, Great Britain, Japan, France, and Italy.

To address the issue of naval disarmament, a formula called the "5:5:3" ratio was proposed. This formula suggested that the United States and Great Britain would be allowed to have the largest naval fleets, totaling five ships each, while Japan would be limited to three ships. The phrase "Rolls-Royce, Rolls-Royce, Ford" was a shorthand representation of this ratio. The United States and Great Britain, as the more powerful nations, were symbolized by the luxury car manufacturer Rolls-Royce, and Japan was represented by the Ford Motor Company, which was perceived as less powerful in comparison.

The reference to "clamoring for the outlawry of war" in relation to these meetings implies that the international community, particularly the American public, was calling for the abolition of warfare as a means of resolving disputes between nations. The Washington Naval Conference, with its focus on disarmament and peaceful negotiations, was seen as a step towards this goal. By imposing limits on naval armaments, the conference aimed to reduce the potential for conflicts and promote collective security. The idea was that by negotiating and setting standards for weapons and military capabilities, nations could work towards a world where war was outlawed or made much less likely.