22. <22{7[1(04)]}> A company can either invest in employee training seminars or update its computer network. Since updating the computer network would result in more measurable benefits, the company would be best off updating its computer network.

The argument above assumes that (Points : 1)
investing in employee training seminars would yield negative results for the company
the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company
the employee training seminars would focus on teaching employees to use the updated computer network
the benefit of the company investing in employee training seminars cannot be measured at all

leaning toward: the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company
or
the benefit of the company investing in employee training seminars cannot be measured at all

My choice: the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company

The argument says nothing about measuring the value of training.

I agree.

The argument above assumes that the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company.

To determine the correct assumption made in the argument, we need to carefully analyze the information provided.

The argument states that the company would be best off updating its computer network because it would result in more measurable benefits. This indicates that the assumption made is related to the value of measurable benefits.

To find the assumption in the argument, we need to identify the premise and the conclusion. The premise is "updating the computer network would result in more measurable benefits," and the conclusion is "the company would be best off updating its computer network."

The assumption necessary to connect the premise and the conclusion is that the more measurable a benefit is, the greater value it has to a company. This implies that the argument assumes "the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company."

Therefore, the correct assumption made in the argument is "the more measurable a benefit, the greater value that benefit has to a company."