evolution has installed tendencies in our selection of a mate. Two of the strongest predictors in human mate selection today are:
a) wealth and attractive
b) attractiveness and youth
c) similarity and proximity
d) the best genetics and submission
i chose A but i think this is from a womens stand point what do you all think?
I agree. Both men and women seek attractive mates who are successful.
I vote for c) similarity and proximity.
see page 2
http://www.lascap.de/Downloads/Human%20mate%20choice%20as%20the%20psychologist%20views%20it.pdf
I vote for C too. I think I remember learning this in one of my psych classes.
Similarity and proximity are definitely right.
The question asks for two of the strongest predictors in human mate selection today. The answer options provided are:
a) wealth and attractiveness
b) attractiveness and youth
c) similarity and proximity
d) the best genetics and submission
Based on research and evolutionary psychology, all of these factors can play a role in mate selection, but the question asks for the strongest predictors. Let's go through each option to better understand their relevance:
a) Wealth and attractiveness: This option suggests that both wealth and attractiveness are important factors in mate selection. Typically, wealth can be indicative of status and resources, which may be highly desirable in evolutionary terms. Attractiveness, on the other hand, can signal good genes and the ability to produce healthy offspring. Both men and women can be influenced by these factors in mate selection, although their relative importance may vary across cultures and individual preferences.
b) Attractiveness and youth: Here, attractiveness and youth are identified as key predictors. Again, physical attractiveness can be considered an indicator of good genetic traits, such as health and reproductive fitness. Youthfulness is often associated with fertility, which is crucial for successful reproduction. Like option a, this option can be relevant for both men and women when choosing a mate, but societal expectations and individual preferences can also shape the relative importance of these factors.
c) Similarity and proximity: This option emphasizes the importance of characteristics like similarity and proximity in mate selection. People tend to be attracted to those who are similar to them in terms of values, personality traits, interests, and background. Proximity, or geographical nearness, enables opportunities for interaction and relationship development. While similarity and proximity are important factors in forming interpersonal relationships, they may not necessarily be the strongest predictors of mate selection.
d) The best genetics and submission: This option includes "the best genetics" and "submission" as predictors. However, it is important to note that there is significant variation in individual preferences when it comes to mate selection, and these factors may not universally hold true. The concept of "best genetics" may be subjective, based on cultural norms, personal preferences, and reproductive goals. The idea of "submission" in mate selection is mostly aligned with certain cultural or historical contexts and is not universally applicable in contemporary partner choices.
Considering all the options given, it may be challenging to determine the "strongest" predictors of mate selection, as personal preferences can vary greatly. Additionally, mate selection is influenced by a combination of genetic, social, cultural, and individual factors. Therefore, it would be incorrect to confidently declare any single option as being universally applicable to both men and women.