Posted by Rebekah on Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 2:22pm.
No it is not correct. 0.049 does not round up to 0.1
where did you get 0.049?
Look at the last two digits of your problem. 0.249 does not round up to 0.3
oh so is it incorrect and the answer is 1.2 or is it 1.20? does the second answer have 3 sig figs?
why does KMnO4 act as self indicator in titration invoulving KMnO4?
ernest y did u post that on my question? it doesn't ever pertain to my question
Related Questions
Chemisty (Sig Figs) - Each of the following numbers was supposed to be rounded ...
Physics Sig Figs - When you are multiplying two numbers, how do you determine ...
SIG FIGS - How many significant figures does 22.0, 0.22, 22. , 0.022? Im just ...
Science (Chemistry!) - I just do not understand ANYTHING about multiplying/...
algebra - SEE BELOW PLEASE at******** If computing N(t) = Pa^t where P=642....
algebra - SEE BELOW PLEASE at******** If computing N(t) = Pa^t where P=642....
math - See below PLEASE at ******** If computing N(t) = Pa^t where P=642.035376 ...
sig figs - each of the following were suppose to be rounded to two sig figs. ...
Math - How many significant figures does 22.0, 0.22, 22. , 0.022? Im just ...
chem sig figs - How many significant figures are in 0.0? And how about 0.00?
For Further Reading