Some analysts maintain that the United States is poorly served by a Congress that is often beset by inaction and localism. Supporters of the Congress maintain that the institution is a superior deliberative and representative institution. Which argument is the more persuasive and why?
After you have researched the below sites and have written an answer, please repost and we will be happy to make further suggestions if needed.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=positive+opinions+regarding+today%27s+Congress&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=positive+opinions+regarding+today%27s+Congress&gs_rfai=CUYshPPdiTM7kO5XggwTHj_j2BQAAAKoEBU_Q-FPa&fp=f9519659d5d079d0
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=negative+views+of+today%27s+Congress&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=negative+views+of+today%27s+Congress&gs_rfai=Cc3vMofdiTOXLIoXyzATu7unACgAAAKoEBU_Qc7Pe&fp=f9519659d5d079d0
To determine which argument is more persuasive between the claim that the United States is poorly served by Congress and the claim that Congress is a superior deliberative and representative institution, let's examine both arguments.
1. Analysts' argument: The United States is poorly served by Congress due to inaction and localism.
To assess this claim, we can consider the following steps:
a. Research congressional performance: Look into the track record of Congress in terms of passing legislation, addressing pressing issues, and making decisions in a timely manner. Review instances where Congress has faced criticism for being inactive or gridlocked.
b. Analyze the impact of localism: Research and understand the concept of localism, which refers to when representatives prioritize the interests of their constituents over national priorities. Assess how localism could potentially impede the efficient functioning of Congress and affect the broader interests of the country.
c. Consider different perspectives: Look for discussions or studies that provide insights from political scientists, experts, and citizens on whether Congress's perceived inaction and localism hinder the effective functioning of the United States as a whole.
2. Supporters' argument: Congress is a superior deliberative and representative institution.
To evaluate this claim, consider these steps:
a. Understand the role of a deliberative institution: Research the concept of a deliberative institution, which emphasizes thoughtful and inclusive decision-making processes, taking into account diverse perspectives. Assess whether Congress fulfills this role by engaging in robust debate and considering various viewpoints when crafting legislation.
b. Assess representation: Investigate how effectively Congress represents the interests and concerns of the American people. Consider factors such as the diversity of legislators, their ability to connect with constituents and advocate for their needs, and the mechanisms in place for meaningful citizen participation in the legislative process.
c. Examine historical examples: Look for instances throughout U.S. history where Congress displayed its capacity for effective deliberation and representation. Evaluate whether these examples are sufficient evidence to support Congress being considered a superior institution.
After performing these steps, you can weigh the evidence and arguments for both sides to determine which one you find more persuasive. It's crucial to consider various sources, expert opinions, and empirical data to form an informed judgment.