When an animated cartoon was made of Animal Farm, it was given a happy ending. Animals everywhere hear that Napoleon has betrayed the cause of animalism. They join in a second revolution and succeed in overthrowing him. This leads to the establishment of the original ideal socialist society, embracing freedom and true equality. Write an essay expressing whether you think this happy ending could possibly happen or if it is, as one critic noted, nonsensical. Use at least three references from the novel to support your ideas.
Since we don't do your homework for you, what is your specific question?
This site may be of help to you.
http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/animalfarm/
Thank you. I need an opinion on this. Whats your's? And what is animalism?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animalism_(Animal_Farm)#Animalism
Thanks for your help. But I figured it out on my own. I don't need websites like Spark Notes and Wikipedia to help me. Plus they are not reliable sources because people can go in and edit the page and put in whatever they want. But thank you. In the future I expect an answer from you suppposedly teachers..don't just give me the websites. I don't just want the answer though, it was my mistake to just put write me an essay on this just a sensible opinion or mini answer from you guys. Thank you! Have a great day! :)
The answer by the way to this question is... A happy ending would be nice, but it is nonsensical because first of all this is not how it happened in the novel. Second, a socialist society does not represent freedom and true equality. I have other answers and reasons and references but I don't want to post it because other ppl may just steal my answer.
If all you do is post your entire assignment, not much will happen since no one here will do your work for you. But if you are specific about what you don't understand about the assignment or exactly what help you need, someone might be able to assist you.
If you are already able to do your own work, then you don't need to post here, right? You'd need to post only when you have a specific question about the assignment or what you are thinking of as the answer.
To analyze the possibility of a happy ending with a second revolution in George Orwell's Animal Farm, it is essential to explore the events portrayed in the novel and evaluate the underlying themes and messages conveyed by the author. By examining the narrative structure and key references within the novel, we can ascertain whether such an outcome is plausible or if it aligns with the opinion of critics who deem it nonsensical.
First and foremost, it is crucial to acknowledge the overall tone and themes of Animal Farm. Orwell presents a scathing critique of totalitarian governments and the corruption of power, drawing parallels to the Russian Revolution and subsequent rise of Joseph Stalin. The novel emphasizes the cyclical nature of oppression and the difficulty in achieving a true socialist utopia. The pessimistic tone throughout the story suggests that a happy ending is unlikely.
One reference that supports this view is the portrayal of Napoleon, the lead boar who comes to embody tyranny, parallel to Stalin. Throughout the novel, Napoleon consolidates power and enforces strict control over the farm, intensifying inequality and exploiting the working-class animals. His ruthless mechanisms of manipulation and violence are established early on, such as the expulsion and scapegoating of Snowball, symbolizing Stalin's purge of Leon Trotsky. This narrative element presents the idea that those in power are unlikely to willingly relinquish it, making a successful second revolution improbable.
Another factor to consider is the disillusionment and ignorance of the lower-class animals. Orwell highlights the manipulation and distortion of information by the ruling elite in order to maintain control. One example of this is the revisionist alteration of the Seven Commandments, which are initially established as the tenets of Animalism but are progressively modified to justify the ruling class's actions. The animals' lack of critical thinking and their susceptibility to propaganda render a second revolution less plausible, as they have already fallen victim to manipulation once and could easily be deceived again.
Furthermore, the use of allegory in Animal Farm serves as a powerful tool to convey Orwell's message. The characters and events represent real-life counterparts, and the animals' inability to challenge the established order mirrors the issue of repressive regimes. The underlying notion is that revolutions are often co-opted, with power transferring from one group to another rather than being eliminated entirely. This emphasis on the enduring nature of oppression strengthens the argument against a happy ending in which a second revolution succeeds in establishing a utopian society.
In conclusion, it is highly unlikely that the happy ending depicted in the animated cartoon adaptation of Animal Farm could occur in the actual novel. Orwell's meticulous construction of the narrative, including references to Napoleon's tyranny, the animals' vulnerability to manipulation, and the overarching theme of cyclical oppression, strongly suggests a pessimistic outcome. The novel serves as a cautionary tale and a critique of totalitarianism, emphasizing the challenges and complexities of achieving true equality and freedom. Thus, the view that the happy ending is nonsensical aligns more closely with the core themes and messages of Animal Farm.