Posted by **Steven** on Saturday, June 12, 2010 at 3:08pm.

A canidatate for governor of a certain state claims to be favored by at least half of the voters. If a hypothesis test is performed, how should you interpret a decision that rejects the null hypothesis?

A. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5

B. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5

C. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5

D. There is sufficinet evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5

- statistics -
**PsyDAG**, Sunday, June 13, 2010 at 12:37pm
Do you have the carats (>) facing in the right direction?

> = is greater than, < = is less than

To reject the null hypothesis, you would want sufficient evidence that P ≤ .05.

- statistics -
**mEBNDZfyKjtT**, Monday, October 31, 2011 at 4:16pm
I love reading these articles because they're short but inofmartvie.

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- statistics - The proportion of adults in the US with basic literary skills is 43...
- math/stats - Which of the following statements are true? (A) In a two-tail test ...
- statistics - he mean height of a certain kind of plant is 190 centimeters. ...
- Statistics - Which of these statements is always true for a researcher who is ...
- Statistics - Can someone please help with this problem to advise how to set up ...
- Statistics - It is believed that at least 60% of voters from a certain region in...
- Statistics - A manufacturer of sports equipment claims that the new fishing line...
- statistics - Your muffler factory claims to manufacture mufflers with a ...
- `Statistics - A public relations firm found only 9% of voters in a certain state...
- statistics - 5. A teacher wishes to compare two different groups of students ...

More Related Questions