I read the article who is holy and i need some help in writting a 200 word critique on this article. I find no fault in this article.

Is this the article?

http://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/378872/jewish/Who-is-Holy.htm

If this is your reading

http://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/378872/jewish/Who-is-Holy.htm
Then the fault I see it is it bases the concept of holy on one Jewish script, the Parshah cited. Are the others which could be used? Even other religions? It is very difficult to prove the general (what is holy) from a specific.

To write a critique of an article, it's important to provide a balanced analysis and identify both strengths and potential weaknesses. Even if you found no fault in the article, you can still provide constructive feedback or points for improvement. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you write a 200-word critique:

1. Introduction (25-30 words):
- Briefly introduce the article and state that you found no significant faults.

2. Summary (50-60 words):
- Summarize the main points or arguments presented in the article concisely and accurately.

3. Analysis of strengths (80-90 words):
- Identify and discuss the strong points of the article, such as its clarity, logical structure, or comprehensive coverage.
- Provide specific examples from the article to support your claims.

4. Constructive feedback (30-40 words):
- Even if you found no faults, you can suggest potential areas for improvement or additional topics the article could have addressed.

5. Conclusion (20-30 words):
- Conclude your critique by reiterating the overall positive impression you have of the article while acknowledging the possibility of further enhancement.

Remember to support your points with evidence and maintain an objective tone throughout your critique. Though the article may be exceptional, offering suggestions for improvement can still elevate your critique.