Posted by Rosedala on Monday, April 12, 2010 at 3:58pm.
1,000 ml * 12 = ?
Divide 60 by the above number to get the cost per ml.
750 ml * 12 = ?
Divide 40 by the above number to get the cost per ml.
I'm sorry Ms. Sue, but I'm an arithmetic-challenged adult and my face is quite red:
I divided 60 by 1000 and got 0.06
Did the same with 40 and got 0.0533
How do I know which is cheaper since the 2nd one has less content (only 3/4 of liter as opposed to one full liter?
Please forgive my taking your time again, and thanks so very much! :o)
1000 * 12 is not 1000
1000 * 12 = 12,000
60/12,000 = $0.005 per ml.
The way to compare these is to find the cost per ml.
What is the cost per ml for the other box?
Thank Ms. Sue!
I multiplied 750 x 12 = 9000
I divided 9000 by 12 = 0.00666
So...the smaller bottles are then more expensive despite the fact that the price tag is lower.
Thanks again a lot! :-)
Why did you divide 9,000 by 12?
You need to divide 9,000 ml by the total cost.
Oh I'm sorry (I'll never get this into my cerebrum!)...
The lower price tag is indeed cheaper. This time I got 0.00444. This makes it one tenth of a cent cheaper?
I'll write this little formula for my future purchases. Thank you so much!
1 litre per bottle
Related Questions
calculus - A company wants to bid on an order of 20,000 square based boxes which...
science - How many mililiters are in 3.5 KL. There are a thousand ml per liter, ...
phisics - The drawing shows two boxes resting on frictionless ramps. One box is ...
physics - The drawing shows two boxes resting on frictionless ramps. One box is ...
physics - Two boxes, A and B, are connected to each end of a light vertical rope...
NEWTON'S LAWS (FORCES) - Two boxes, A and B, are connected to each end of a ...
chemistry - Here's the problem: You need to make 300L of 2.25M perchloric ...
arithmetic - A store manager just received 117 movies packaged in boxes. If the ...
AP Physics - Two 10 kilogram boxes are connected by a massless frictionless ...
College Algebra - Staples recently charged $17.99 per box of Pilot Precise ...
For Further Reading