Posted by **Anonymous ** on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 12:55am.

i don't understand this, Show that if G(x) is an antiderivitive for f(X) and G(2)=-2 then G(4)=-7+((integral))top number 4 lower number 2 f(X)dx

its so confusing.? HELP. Thanks!!

- Calculus Theorem! !!!???? -
**drwls**, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 10:53am
There is a fundamental theorem oc calculaus that states that the integral of f(x)dx from a to b is

G(b) - G(a). This assumes than f is the derivative of G (or G is the integral of f).

Therefore

G(4) = G(2) + integral(2 to 4)of f(x)dx

What you wrote is not correct. The -7 should be -2.

- Calculus Theorem! !!!???? -
**Anonymous **, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 10:04pm
so does this mean that the equation is incorrect, or it is like undefined. That is exactly how it is in the paper, and it says to explain why it is right? So do i write it is incorrect.

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- calculus - Use the Midpoint Rule to approximate the integral: the upper number ...
- calculus - Evaluate the definite integral: upper number of the integral is 6 ...
- calculus - Use the Upper Bound theorem to find an integral upper bound and the ...
- calculus - Evaluate the integral upper number is 8 lower number is 1 1/x^2 times...
- calculus - find an antiderivitive for integral(f looking sing)3/3x+4 dx
- calculus - upper number is 1 lower number of the integral is 0 u^3(u^-1/2+u^-1/5...
- CALCULUS! - suppose that 3 <_ f prime of x <_ 5, for all values x. show ...
- math{HELP HELP} - i don't understand these mmath equations. 1) 6y = 24 2)y / 7...
- Maths Calculus Derivative Integral - Urgent Please - Use 2nd Fundamental Theorem...
- Math - Three times a number is the same as that number subtracted from 12. What ...

More Related Questions