Language Analysis

Please help me find persuasive techniques/statements in the following article..

I've never done this before, and I've "stewed" over the subject for the last couple of days, but I'm absolutely incensed that the Victorian Government will be tossing in money to bring Tiger Woods to Australia for a "golf game". I'm not even a Victorian, but a this moment I'm feeling pretty "ripped off". This country came together as a whole not 6 weeks ago and dug deep for our Victorian mates to get back on their feet after those devastating bush fires. To think that the Victorian Government has money in it's coffers to pay a bloke, whom lets face it doesn't need the money, to come here and play a game of golf is just the most ludicrous thing I think I've heard of late. Surely that money could go to the odd hospital, school perhaps or even "God forbid", the forestry people to ensure that they can clean up their bushland and put in place measures to make sure that devastation of that caliber never happens again. We have been hearing, seeing, reading on a daily basis about the "economic crisis", about high flying executives getting huge payouts and the loss of jobs, and manufacturing of Aussie goods to overseas. Tell me then how can the VIC Government justify this expenditure? Golf Game - For those lucky enough to afford it. - Wonder how many Victorian Bushfire Victims will be able to attend. Tiger Woods - Who cares!! - He'll be another who takes his money off shore. The Cost - Again what's a person really worth?

Its a letter to the editor we are analysing.

i am asked to write about a group of adult who are illiterate using all the techniques of persuasion but i don't understand how to do it can you help please.

In the given article, there are several persuasive techniques and statements that can be identified. Here are some examples:

1. Emotional Appeal: The author starts by expressing their personal emotions and using strong words like "incensed," "ripped off," and "ludicrous" to convey a sense of anger and disbelief. This appeal to emotion aims to evoke a similar emotional response in the reader.

2. Rhetorical Question: The author asks rhetorical questions such as "Surely that money could go to the odd hospital, school perhaps" and "Tell me then how can the VIC Government justify this expenditure?" These questions are designed to make the reader think critically about the allocation of resources and highlight the perceived lack of justification.

3. Sarcasm/Irony: The author uses phrases like "God forbid" and "Who cares!!" to convey a sense of irony and disbelief. This technique aims to undermine the importance placed on the golf game and Tiger Woods, suggesting that there are more important priorities for the government to address.

4. Appeal to Consequences: The author raises the issue of the economic crisis, high executive payouts, job losses, and manufacturing being outsourced. By mentioning these negative consequences, the author implies that the government's decision to spend money on a golf game is misplaced and neglects more pressing issues affecting the community.

These persuasive techniques and statements are used to sway the reader's opinion against the decision to bring Tiger Woods to Australia for a golf game and to call into question the priorities and actions of the Victorian Government.