Most modern style manuals endorse the elimination of sexist language. Would the reduction of sexist language influence the thoughts or attitudes of individuals who comply with these standards? Why or why not?

Yes. If nurses and elementary teachers are always referred to as "she," don't we tend to think of them as women? If CEOs and their "wives" are invited, don't we tend to think of CEOs as men?

Language is powerful!

Thanks! This makes sense.

Determining whether the reduction of sexist language would influence the thoughts or attitudes of individuals who comply with modern style manuals is a complex matter that depends on various factors. Here's how you can approach this question:

1. Understand the impact of language on attitudes: Start by understanding the potential influence of language on attitudes. Language is a powerful tool that not only reflects societal norms but also shapes them. Certain words or phrases can perpetuate stereotypes, reinforce gender biases, or marginalize certain groups.

2. Research the guidelines in modern style manuals: Investigate the guidelines provided by modern style manuals regarding the elimination of sexist language. Style manuals often suggest using inclusive language that treats all people with respect, regardless of their gender. This includes avoiding the generic use of male pronouns, using gender-neutral terms, and being mindful of biased or stereotypical expressions.

3. Consider psychological and sociolinguistic perspectives: To determine the impact on thoughts and attitudes, consider psychological and sociolinguistic research. Studies show that language influences cognitive processes, such as memory, perception, and categorization. Exposure to non-sexist language can lead to more egalitarian attitudes by challenging existing gender stereotypes.

4. Recognize individual differences: Keep in mind that individuals' responses to language change can vary. Some may readily adopt non-sexist language and experience a positive shift in attitudes. Others may resist or not perceive any significant change. Cultural, social, and personal factors, including one's beliefs, upbringing, and exposure to diverse perspectives, play a role in shaping individual responses.

5. Analyze broader social impact: Reflect on the potential broader social impact of reducing sexist language. While changing language alone may not eradicate systemic sexism, it can contribute to creating a more inclusive and equitable society. By challenging gender biases embedded in language, it signals a commitment to equality and promotes cultural change.

It's important to note that the influence of language is multidimensional and can interact with various other factors. Thus, individual responses to the reduction of sexist language may vary. Conducting further research and consulting psychological, sociolinguistic, and sociocultural studies would provide an in-depth understanding of this topic.