Posted by sam on Friday, March 12, 2010 at 12:23pm.
It has to be retorical, because the premise is not true. The equal protection amendment was first applied to juries, then to transportation, then to voting rights, and some 80 years after it was inacted was it applied to school attendence. Then the conclusion is wrong: The equal protection clause applies only to government, not anything else. What has happened is that the Civil Rights act (passed under the commerce clause) extended the "equality" of races to many other fields, outside the bounds of just government bodies.
Yes, it is retoric.
thanks, what type of rhetorical is this?
You can get answers from uopaxiasolutions dot com for CRT205 if you're interested.
Related Questions
math - if attendance at a certain high school had incresed by 30 percent over ...
Math - The school's total attendance is 449, there are 81 present in math ...
5th grade fractions - Attendance at the Fireman's Ball has been declining. ...
Math - The mean attendance at a ball game was 120. The median attendance was125....
history - by 1910, why had public-school enrollment reach a record high a. ...
Statistics - The relationship between the number of games won during one season...
statistics - The attendance at the school play on Friday was 95% of the ...
FZN - Your school has contracted with a professional magician to perform. The ...
English - I need help fixing up this essay so that it flows betters. Here are ...
Algebra - The question is the following: YOur school has contracted with a ...
For Further Reading
