Write a persuasive, formal letter to aspecific European philosopher. The assignment should be between 700-1050Words.

· In the letter,argue that this philosopher is incorrect in his or her view about a particularissue.
· Providesupport from your readings, examples from your experience, and your ownanalysis to prove the philosopher wrong.
· Post the letteras an attachment.
about albert camus

How would you like us to HELP you with this assignment?

I need to know more about albert cumus and his theses on life is absurd also how should I start my letter . That is alot to write when you have so little to go on . and we cant write anything about them because it is a letter to them.

trudy

Dear M. Camus:

Your thesis on life is absurd.

anything else you can help with this is what i have so far. dear albert camus , you wtote a these that life is absurd that there is no reason why things are the way they are also imply that life is unjust and fruitratis human needs . That many peopel need to make choices and how to act in a valueless and absurd world. You say there is two basic needs the first is the need for clarity or understaning and the second one is the need for social warmth and contact. what do you think so far I do not want to plarerize and my teacher has been very hard on me about writing my own words and citing my sources which is hard for me some times.

But you CAN include examples of what you think is absurd from his writings. (See your instructions.)

Citation information:

You need to have each source of information cited in TWO places:

A. the Works Cited page that is placed after the last page of your paper, and
B. in parentheses in the text of your paper, immediately after the quotation or paraphrase.

For example, this would go on the Works Cited page (with proper indentation for the second and following lines):

Du Bois, W.E.B. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago, 1903. Project Bartleby. Ed. Steven van Leeuwen. Dec. 1995. Columbia U. 2 Dec. 2009
<www.cc.columbia.edu/acis/bartleby/dubois/>.

... and this would go immediately after the quotation or whatever:
(Du Bois)

The information in parentheses in the text needs to be as brief as possible. That's why there's a Works Cited page – for all the details of the listing.

------------------
(Broken Link Removed)

In the website above, hold your cursor over the words CITING SOURCES in the left column and then click on whatever type of source you need help with. Many examples will show up. You will get two examples for each type of reference – one for the Works Cited page and one for the parenthetical (in-text) citation.

You can also see what a Works Cited page looks like – click on Sample Works Cited in the left column.

but what do you think of what i have so far is it ok.

Please read what you have written aloud to someone else ... and then make corrections. Then re-post, and someone here will be happy to comment. It's too rough right now to be read easily.

Thanks. =)

I to write a letter to a philosopher I don't understand how?

Subject: Challenging Albert Camus' Perspective on Existentialism

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]

[Philosopher's Name]
[Philosopher's Address]
[City, State, ZIP]

Dear [Philosopher's Name],

I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to you today as an admirer of your work and to engage in a profound discourse regarding your perspective on existentialism. While your contributions to the realm of philosophy are undeniably influential, I respectfully disagree with some aspects of your viewpoint.

Firstly, I would like to express my appreciation for your concept of the Absurd and its exploration in your renowned work, "The Myth of Sisyphus." Your thoughts on the human condition and its confrontation with the inherent absurdities of life shed light on the complexities of existence. However, I would contend that your argument lacks one crucial aspect: the potential for personal growth and meaning-seeking within this absurdity.

In stating that life is essentially devoid of intrinsic meaning, you argue that all endeavors are ultimately futile. While I acknowledge the existential crisis this notion can cause, I believe that it is possible for individuals to find subjective meaning in their lives, even in a world indifferent to our existence. The pursuit of personal values, connections with others, and the quest for knowledge are all avenues that can provide individuals with purpose and fulfillment in a seemingly meaningless universe.

Moreover, I find your rejection of hope in the face of absurdity disheartening. Although you maintain that hope is an illusion and a denial of reality, I respectfully disagree. Hope serves as a driving force, motivating individuals to persevere through hardships and strive for better futures. It provides solace in times of despair and allows us to find glimpses of meaning in the face of adversity.

While I recognize the reasoning behind your argument that suicide can be seen as a valid response to the absurd, I believe it overlooks the strength and resilience inherent in the human spirit. Countless individuals throughout history have faced overwhelming odds and unimaginable suffering, yet they have found the courage to carry on. By embracing life's challenges and acknowledging our individual freedom to create meaning, we can navigate the Absurd and find purpose in existence.

Furthermore, your assertion that Camusian Absurdism is incompatible with religious or spiritual beliefs warrants discussion. You argue that religion, by its nature, seeks to impose absolute meaning upon existence, rendering it incompatible with the Absurd. However, I contend that individuals can find solace and a sense of meaning through spiritual beliefs, even within the framework of existentialist philosophy. Religion can provide guidelines for ethical living and offer a system of values that allows individuals to navigate the Absurd with grace and integrity.

In conclusion, while I deeply value your contributions to existentialism and the intellectual debates surrounding the Absurd, I challenge some aspects of your perspective. I firmly believe that within the Absurd, individuals possess the ability to find subjective meaning, retain hope, face adversity with resilience, and reconcile existential philosophy with religious or spiritual beliefs. It is through these acts of personal agency and exploration that we can truly challenge and transcend the limitations of existential absurdity.

I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to engage in further dialogue on this fascinating topic. Your insights have greatly influenced my own intellectual journey, and I am truly grateful for the opportunity to present my thoughts in this letter.

Yours respectfully,

[Your Name]