Posted by Sandra on Monday, February 15, 2010 at 6:40am.
Firstly, you are to use not the product rule, but the quotient rule, check out the related wikipedia article. Secondly, there is no necessity to "get rid" of R. Your solution can depend on R, for example. Just treat R as a constant (In fact it is, Radius (R) = 2.7 times 10^(-1) m)
You made a number of errors.
= {{1/(z^2+R^2)^3/2}} - {{2z^2}} / {{(z^2+R^2)^5/2}}
set it equal to zero. multiply both sides by (z^2+R^2)^3/2
0=1-2z/(z^2+R^2)
so 2z=z^2+R^2
z^2-2z+R^2=0
z=(2+-sqrt(4-4R))/2=1+-sqrt(1-R)
check my math.
Related Questions
Physics - Two 18.0 cm diameter charged rings face each other, 22.0 cm apart. The...
Physics - Consider a charged ring of radius 43.4 cm and total charge 18 nC. We ...
Physics (2) - Consider a charged ring of radius 43.4 cm and total charge 18 nC. ...
Physics - Two 10 cm diameter charged rings face each other, 20 cm apart. The ...
Physics - Two 10 cm diameter charged rings face each other, 20 cm apart. The ...
Physics - Consider a ring of radius a containing q amount of negative charges. ...
physics - A thin ring of radius equal to 25 cm carries a uniformly distributed ...
Physics - A thin ring of radius equal to 25 cm carries a uniformly distributed ...
physics - A charge of 2.1 nC and a charge of 4.7 nC are separated by 57.90 cm. ...
physics - A charge of 2.0 nC and a charge of 5.3 nC are separated by 41.80 cm. ...
For Further Reading