what might happen if a human service agency did not determine the cost per output/cost per outcome?
If a human service agency does not determine the cost per output/cost per outcome, several negative consequences may arise:
1. Inefficient resource allocation: Without knowing the cost per output or outcome, the agency cannot accurately assess the effectiveness and efficiency of their programs. This can lead to ineffective resource allocation, with funds being wasted on programs that do not produce tangible results.
2. Lack of accountability: Cost per output/cost per outcome analysis provides a measure of accountability by evaluating the agency's performance and impact. Without this information, it becomes challenging to hold the agency responsible for its actions and outcomes.
3. Difficulty in planning and decision-making: Determining the cost per output/outcome helps in planning and decision-making processes. It allows the agency to identify areas of improvement, set targets and goals, and make informed decisions about resource allocation. Without this data, the agency may struggle to make evidence-based decisions and may miss opportunities for improvement.
4. Limited performance evaluation: Cost per output/outcome analysis provides valuable insights to assess the performance of programs, identify successful interventions, and improve service delivery. Without this analysis, the agency may have limited visibility into which programs are effective, preventing them from replicating successful strategies or improving underperforming programs.
To avoid these consequences, it is crucial for human service agencies to determine the cost per output/cost per outcome. This involves tracking and analyzing relevant data, calculating costs, and comparing them against the desired outputs and outcomes. It enables agencies to measure their effectiveness, make informed decisions, and ensure accountability in serving their intended beneficiaries.